Legal Opinion

King Mfg. Co. v. Fabian

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided December 14, 1937PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant Winifred King moves to strike the bill for reasons stated below.

Last summer Miss King instituted an action at law against King Manufacturing Company to recover $1,400 alleged to have been loaned to the company in April and May of 1935. The company answered that on November 30th, 1935, the plaintiff executed and delivered to it a release under seal discharging all demands and claims then existing in favor of the plaintiff against the company. Miss King replied with a denial, besides special matters. At this stage, the company and two individuals who hold fifty-one per cent. of its…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cornish v. BryanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1854
  2. Motley v. DarlingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1916
  3. Maplewood Township v. MargolisNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928
  4. Sweeny v. WilliamsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1883
  5. Smith-Austermuhl Co. v. Jersey Railways Advertising Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1918

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Verdi v. PriceNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API