Legal Opinion
AM/PM Franchise Ass'n v. Atlantic Richfield Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 28, 1990No. 95 E.D. Appeal Docket 1989Published
1Opinion of the Court
526 Pa. 110 (1990)
584 A.2d 915
AM/PM FRANCHISE ASSOCIATION, Salvatore Miluzzo, Robert J. Williams, Robert E. Recotta, Paul Hastings and Thomas E. Doyle, Appellants,
v.
ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY, Appellee.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Argued January 25, 1990.
Decided December 28, 1990.
Sol H. Weiss, Bryn Mawr, Nancy L. Goldstein, Philadelphia, for appellants.
Charles I. Thompson, James D. Coleman, Philadelphia, for appellee.
Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT, ZAPPALA, PAPADAKOS and CAPPY, JJ.
OPINION OF THE COURT
CAPPY, Justice.
Before us is an appeal by members of a franchisee…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Delahanty v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Neville Chemical Company v. Union Carbide CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Kassab v. SoyaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Hoffman v. Misericordia HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.