Legal Opinion

Deaton v. Unit Crane & Shovel Corp.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1953PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

Not only did the learned trial court submit the question in the special verdict relating to the negligence of defendant’s crane operator under the safe-place statute (sec. 101.06, Stats.), but the court also instructed the jury on defendant’s liability under such statute. In such instructions the trial court also defined the phrase “as free from danger to him [plaintiff] as the nature or place of employment would reasonably permit,” which is a close approximation of the language employed in sec. 101.01 (11) in defining the term “safe.”

We consider such submission of defendant’s negligence on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nimits v. Motor Transport Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Wannmacher v. Baldauf Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Fondow v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Transport Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Nalepinski v. DurnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Savina v. Wisconsin Gas Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Gilson v. Drees Bros.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Gross v. DenowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Barth v. Downey Co., Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Hofflander v. St. Catherine's Hospital, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API