Legal Opinion

People v. Walter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 9, 2012PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Barry M. Donalty, A.J.), entered August 8, 2011. The order determined that defendant is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.

*1443It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: On appeal from an order determining that he is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act ([SORA] Correction Law § 168 et seq.), defendant contends that Supreme Court erred in considering unreliable hearsay when making its SORA determination. “Because…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. People v. LawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. People v. WraggAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. GlanowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  2. GLANOWSKI, ROBERT L., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  3. People v. DziedzicAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  4. People v. GlanowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API