Legal Opinion

People v. Law

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 27, 2012PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from an order of the Ontario County Court (Craig J. *1562Doran, J.), entered December 15, 2008. The order determined that defendant is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act following a redetermination hearing.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order determining that he is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act ([SORA] Correction Law § 168 et seq.). Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that he should not have been assessed 10…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. MingoNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. People v. WilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. People v. JewellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. People v. GeorgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  4. People v. DabneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
  5. People v. LancasterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API