Legal Opinion

Smith v. Stuckey

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 8, 1998No. A98A0742PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pope, Presiding Judge.

Appellees W. S. Stuckey, Jr., Lynda Stuckey Franklin (the “Stuckeys”) and Citizens Corporation (“Citizens”) sued appellant Hal M. Smith, Jr., for specific performance of a stock option agreement, or in the alternative for a declaratory judgment. A jury granted the Stuckeys and Citizens specific performance under the agreement and awarded them attorney fees in the amount of $14,687.75. Smith appeals from the denial of his motions for directed verdict on the ground that the stock option agreement was void under the rule against perpetuities. He also appeals the trial…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brown v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  2. Shiver v. BentonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  3. Pulte Home Corp. v. Woodland Nursery & Landscapes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  4. Turner v. PeacockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  5. Reeves v. ComfortSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Monterrey Mexican Restaurant of Wise, Inc. v. LeonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  2. Artzner v. a & a EXTERMINATORS, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  3. Rice v. Lost Mountain Homeowners Assoc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  4. DPLM, Ltd. v. J. H. Harvey Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  5. Marshall v. King & MorgensternCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API