United States v. Morrison
Supreme Court of the United States
1Dissent
*628Justice Souter,
with whom Justice Stevens, Justice Ginsburg, and Justice Breyer join, dissenting.
The Court says both that it leaves Commerce Clause precedent undisturbed and that the Civil Rights Remedy of the Violence Against Women Act of 1994, 42 U. S. C. § 13981, exceeds Congress’s power under that Clause. I find the claims irreconcilable and respectfully dissent.1
I
Our eases, which remain at least nominally undisturbed, stand for the following propositions. Congress has the power to legislate with regard to activity that, in the aggregate, has a substantial effect on interstate commerce.…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.