Legal Opinion

Tetlow's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 20, 1936No. Appeals, 71 and 72PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Maxey,

This is an action for the specific performance of a parol contract for the conveyance of real estate, where the person making such parol agreement died seised of such real estate and no sufficient provision for the performance of the contract had been made by the decedent, all of which proceedings are provided for in the Fiduciary’s Act of June 7, 1917, P. L. 447, section 18 [e], * (20 PS, 615).

The decedent, Eliza Jarman Tetlow, died June 24, 1931. In 1924 and previous thereto she had been a patient in Battle Creek Sanitarium, in Michigan. The petitioner was then a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hart v. CarrollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877
  2. Haslet v. HasletSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1837
  3. Jamison v. DimockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
  4. Goucher v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1839
  5. Baxter v. DoaneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kurland v. StolkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Richardson v. SavageSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Baranyai v. Csihas, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1971
  4. DeCheck v. Clancy, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1945
  5. Emig's EstateYork County Orphans' Court · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API