Legal Opinion

Patton v. Patton

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 26, 1944No. Appeal, 23PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Hughes,

The plaintiff filed this bill in equity to have the defendant declared a trustee ex maleficio, claiming:her deceased husband had fraudulently transferred to the defendant certain personal property, in violation of her rights, under a treaty of marriage existing at the time of said transfer.

The chancellor found the facts to be that Estella Patton and Thomas Patton were married November 1, 1929, and resided together until August 6,-1931, when Thomas Patton left his home in Armstrong County and went to Nebraska, and from there to California, where he died November…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Windolph v. Girard Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  2. Pittsburgh Cut Wire Co. v. SufrinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. King v. LemmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Hummel's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  5. Gallagher v. RoganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Trust Co. v. SzaboSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Smigell v. BrodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Fellabaum v. AlvarezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Overbeck v. McHaleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. Durant v. DurantSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API