Legal Opinion

Smigell v. Brod

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 19, 1951No. Appeals, 254 and 271PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearns,

The two appeals are from orders in an ejectment suit following a jury’s verdict for the defendant. One appeal is by plaintiffs because of the court’s refusal to enter judgment n.o.v. for plaintiffs. The other is by defendant from the grant of a new trial.

Plaintiffs seek possession of real estate under a deed through their deceased father. Defendant who is in possession interposes a defense as equitable owner of a one-third interest, this being claimed as her intestate share as surviving spouse. The basis for defendant’s claim is" that her husband, prior…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cancilla v. BondySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Gourley v. KinleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
  3. Duncan's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1862
  4. Kirk v. KirkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Bratton v. MitchellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1838

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Andrikanics v. AndrekanicsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Balkiewicz v. AsenavageSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Hines EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Bucks County · 1968
  4. Andrikanics v. AndrekanicsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  5. Campbell v. Shick, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lycoming County1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API