Legal Opinion
Richard v. Canning
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided January 21, 1935No. 14866PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JANVIER, Judge.
In this action ex delicto Newton M. Richard, Jr., who was injured in an automobile collision between the car of Matthew P. Canning, in which he was riding as a guest, and another automobile owned and operated by Henry Triegle, Jr., seeks recovery for his injuries and asks for judgment in the sum of - $10,719 solidarily against Canning and Triegle.
Triegle denies that he was in any way at fault, and charges that Canning, who was driving the car in which Richard was riding, and the said Richard as well, were intoxicated, each to the knowledge of the other, and that therefore the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bethancourt v. BayhiLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
- Baader v. Driverless Cars, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
- Simpson v. PardueLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
3Cited by11 opinions
- Gauthier v. FoglemanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1951
- Elba v. ThomasLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1952
- Clinton v. City of West MonroeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
- Otis v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
- New Hampshire Fire Ins. Co. v. BushLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.