Legal Opinion

In Re: Diet Drugs

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 14, 2004No. 03-1601UnpublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHERTOFF, Circuit Judge.

This case is a small chapter in the larger body of litigation involving two diet drugs, “Pondimin” and “Redux,” that American Home Products Corporation (now called “Wyeth”) produced until it pulled them from the market in 1997. Rubin brought suit against Wyeth seeking damages for injuries he allegedly sustained from ingesting the diet drugs. Rubin appeals from the District Court’s order denying his motion for voluntary dismissal without prejudice and granting Wyeth’s motion for summary judgment. For the following reasons, we will affirm.

I

Because we write solely…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. William T. Turner v. Schering-Plough CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  2. Lynne Koplove and Jay S. Koplove v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  3. John Ferguson, Jr. v. George H. Eakle John Ferguson, Jr. Lois KittredgeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  4. Lunderstadt v. ColafellaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  5. Horvath v. Keystone Health Plan East, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sery v. Federal Business Centers, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
  2. DEMELIA v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
  3. HOUSEMASTER SPV LLC v. BURKEDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
  4. MARSHALL v. ZIMMER, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. PRINGLE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API