Legal Opinion
MARSHALL v. ZIMMER, INC.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 9, 2020No. 2:18-cv-03363Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA RICHARD A. MARSHALL et al., : Plaintiffs : CIVIL ACTION □ ZIMMER, INC. et al., No. 18-3363 Defendants : MEMORANDUM PRATTER, J. sepremperS 2020 In this defective medical device case, the Marshalls allege that the Zimmer Defendants (collectively, “Zimmer’”) are responsible for complications Mr. Marshall suffered a knee replacement surgery. During that surgery, a NextGen RHK knee replacement system manufactured and sold by Zimmer was implanted in Mr. Marshall’s left leg. The stash Ils assert the system was defective,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Betts v. New Castle Youth Development CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- David Oddi v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Berrier v. Simplicity Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.