Legal Opinion

Farmer v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided May 9, 2013No. SUCV201203736BPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fahey, Elizabeth M., J.

Defendant Harmon and Bank Defendants1 (collectively “Defendants”) each move to dismiss plaintiff Dennis Farmer’s amended complaint.2 Farmer moves for partial summary judgment on Count IV: Trespass, Count VI: Action to Quiet or Establish Title to Land, and Count VII: Declaratory Judgment.3 For the reasons stated herein, Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss, in part treated as a Rule 56 Motion,4 are DENIED and Farmer’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is ALLOWED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.

Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss require that the issue of resjudicatabe addressed.…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Iannacchino v. Ford Motor Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  4. Slaney v. Westwood Auto, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  5. US Bank National Association v. IbanezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shea v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nMassachusetts Superior Court · 2013
  2. Jeevanandam v. Santander Bank, N.A.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2014
  3. O'Neil v. Bank of New York MellonMassachusetts Superior Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API