Legal Opinion

Nicholls v. Wheeler

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 15, 1936No. 11229PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Beck, Presiding Justice.

It is a settled rule that a court will not by construction reduce an estate once devised absolutely in fee, by limitations contained in subsequent parts of the will, unless the intent to limit the devise is clearly and unmistakably manifested. If the expression' relied upon to limit the fee once devised be doubtful, the doubt should be resolved in favor of the absolute *506estate. Thomas v. Owens, 131 Ga. 248 (64 S. E. 218); Taylor v. Reid, 144 Ga. 437 (87 S. E. 469); Moore v. Cook, 153 Ga. 840 (113 S. E. 526). Item 1 of the will in question here, while it contains certain…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thomas v. OwensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  2. Moore v. CookSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  3. Taylor v. ReidSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Watts v. FinleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. Houston v. CoramSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
  3. Aiken v. AikenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
  4. Bailey v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  5. Ammons v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API