Legal Opinion

Desert Palace, Inc. v. Hionas (In Re Hionas)

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida.

Decided October 30, 2006No. 18-22989PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

LAUREL MYERSON ISICOFF, Bankruptcy Judge.

This matter came before the Court on October 11, 2006 at 10:30 a.m. on Motion by the Plaintiff, Casino Palace, Inc. d/b/a Caesars Palace (the “Casino”) for Partial Summary Judgment (the “Motion”). Because the Court finds there are disputed issues of material fact as to whether Florida or Nevada law applies in this matter, and as to the amount of the Debtor’s liability to the Casino, partial summary judgment is denied.

SUMMARY

In this adversary proceeding the Casino seeks a determination that…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Vanston Bondholders Protective Committee v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Bishop v. Florida Specialty Paint Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Laspro Consultores LTDA. v. Alinia Corp. (In re Massa Falida Do Banco Cruzeiro Do Sul S.A.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2017
  2. Tabas v. Lehman (In re Capitol Investments, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2012
  3. In Re JafariUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API