Legal Opinion

Walls v. State ex rel. Mallott

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1894No. 16,887PublishedCited by 16 opinions

From tlie Lawrence Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHoward, J.

— This was an action brought by the appellee to reform and foreclose a school fund mortgage. The land mortgaged had been sold twice subsequent to the *17date of the mortgage, and at the time of the bringing of this action it was owned by the appellant Willard.

The complaint is first assailed as defective for the reason that it shows no demand made upon appellant for reformation of the mortgage prior to the commencement of the action ; and we are referred to Axtel v. Chase, 77 Ind. 74, in support of this contention.

That case decides that a cause of action simply to correct an alleged mistake in a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stockwell v. State ex rel. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Slauter v. FavoriteIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Pence v. ArmstrongIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Axtel v. ChaseIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Axtel v. ChaseIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Flowers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Citizens' National Bank v. JudyIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Siebeking v. Ford, Admx., Etc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1958
  4. Drier v. Great American Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Earl v. VanNattaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API