Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance v. Parker

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided August 28, 1984No. 0241PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cureton, Judge:

The Respondent, Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Company, instituted this declaratory judgment action to determine its potential liability to the appellant, James Montgomery, on an automobile insurance policy issued to Julius Montgomery, its insured. Based on a “business use” limitation in the policy, the trial court concluded that the policy afforded no coverage and granted Penn National’s motion for summary judgment. We reverse.

The facts upon which this controversy is based center upon an automobile accident which occurred in July, 1980. James Montgomery was…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. WiscombWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. DeWitt v. YoungSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
  3. Estate of Neal Ex Rel. Delgado v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeNevada Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Exchange Casualty & Surety Co. v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Allstate Insurance Co. v. Wyoming Insurance DepartmentWyoming Supreme Court · 1983

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. McKeonArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  2. PENNA. NAT'L MUT. CAS. INS. CO. v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  3. Farmland Mutual Insurance v. Jim Moore Cadillac-Oldsmobile, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  4. George Ex Rel. Estate of George v. Empire Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  5. Farmland Mut. Ins. Co. v. JIM MOORE CAD.-OLDS.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API