Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Christian

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 19, 1888No. 15PublishedCited by 31 opinions

.-APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. ■ This was a suit in equity brought in the United States Gir- . cuit Court in 1883 by the appellees, George Christian and Jerry Stuart, against the appellant, Joel Johnson, praying an injunction to restrain him from enforcing a judgment in, ejectment which he obtained in that court against said appellees, for the recovery of certain lands in their possession, and to quiet their title…

Read the full summary

.-APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. ■ This was a suit in equity brought in the United States Gir- . cuit Court in 1883 by the appellees, George Christian and Jerry Stuart, against the appellant, Joel Johnson, praying an injunction to restrain him from enforcing a judgment in, ejectment which he obtained in that court against said appellees, for the recovery of certain lands in their possession, and to quiet their title to said lands against the claims of said appellant. The bill alleged that one Julia J. Johnson, on the 8th day of March,…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lamar

The only issue of fact raised by the pleadings relates to the agency of Iwcurgus L. Johnson for Mrs. Julia J. Johnson, in her capacity as guardian of appellant, in the loan of the funds of her ward to Eobinson upon the security binding the real estate of Eobinson, and the subsequent transactions with appellees as vendees of a part of that land; and upon this point-we are of opinion that the allegations of the bill are abundantly sustained by the proof.

• James F. Robinson, the vendor of the appellees, testified substantially that he knew that Mr. Johnson acted as the agent for Mrs. Julia J.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bagnell v. BroderickSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  2. Insurance Company v. McCainSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Foster v. MoraSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. Langdon v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. Nathan E. Hooper, Louisa J. Hooper, and Amanda E. Hooper, Minors, by Absalom Fowler, Their Next Friend, in Error v. Jacob ScheimerSupreme Court of the United States · 1860

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Dunham v. StitzbergNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Lockhart v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Continental Fire Ins. v. BrooksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
  4. Carter v. RuddySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Hall v. Union Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API