Legal Opinion

Kripner v. Lincoln

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 26, 1894PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Memorandum.—Assumpsit. Error to the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. James Goggin, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Shepard

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Judgments by confession were entered against the plaintiff in error, and two others, as maker of two promissory notes. '

The notes and powers of attorney to confess judgment were substantially alike except as to amounts and dates. The one earliest in date was as follows:

$100. Chicago, August 18, 1893.

One year after date, we jointly and severally promise to pay to Rad Lincoln, Cis. 52, C. S. P. S., or order, the sum of $100, with interest at the rate of six per cent per annum, payable after date, annually.

Value received.

Matej…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Frankland v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Gordon v. GordonIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Gordon v. GordonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1891

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kripner v. LincolnAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API