Kripner v. Lincoln
Appellate Court of Illinois
Assumpsit, upon a promissory note. Error to the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. William C. Ewing, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1896.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gary
This ease is here the second time; 54 Ill. App. 675. We refer to that report for the facts. It comes now without the question then discussed, as to striking out a plea.
The. present record contains non-assumpsit verified, so that whether the notes sued upon are her notes or not, is in issue. The testimony on the part of the appellee, alluded to in the former opinion, was repeated, and consisted of conversations by the appellant with persons connected with the appellee, in which she recognized as fact that she had signed some notes not produced, which she would pay if produced. .Besides that,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Johnson v. GloverIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
- National Brewing Co. v. AhlgrenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1891
- Keeley Brewing Co. v. EmrickAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896
- Kripner v. LincolnAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894