Connecticut Ex Rel. Blumenthal v. United States
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
SQUATRITO, District Judge.
The State of Connecticut (“Connecticut”) brings this action seeking to invalidate as unconstitutional 16 U.S.C. § 1854(f)(1)(A), a portion of the Magnuson-Stevens Act 16 U.S.C. § § 1851, et. seq. The United States of America and the United States Department of Commerce are named as defendants (collectively “the United States”). The defendants have moved for summary judgment [doc. # 60], Connecticut has also moved for summary judgment [doc. # 64]. There are no disputed issues of fact. The court, for the following reasons, GRANTS the motion of the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Raines v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.