United States v. Bowser
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
The government's arguments on this point are not persuasive. Although the government is correct that the OCE was created to operate within the House, it is not the "House" itself. Article 1, section 2 of the Constitution makes clear that the House "shall be composed of Members chosen every second Year by the People of the several States." The OCE is indisputably not composed of "members elected by the people," and therefore it cannot be "the House" as defined by the Constitution. To the contrary, a member of Congress is expressly ineligible to be on the board of the OCE. See H. Res. 895 §…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. AguilarSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Rinaldi v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. GrandersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. Keith D. Long, United States of America v. Sonia E. MayfieldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. BarrowDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- United States v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2025
- United States v. CraigDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- United States v. SaffariniaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- United States v. StoneDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019