Legal Opinion

Riley v. Cimarron-Empire Construction Company

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 22, 1966No. 41867PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVISON, Justice.

This is an original proceeding to review an order of the State Industrial Court en banc denying the claim of Earl A. Riley, Jr., for compensation for disability resulting from a cardiac condition assertedly produced by work induced strain. The respondents have resisted the claim denying liability on the theory that the claimant did not sustain an accidental injury within the purview of the Workmen’s Compensation Law and that the physical condition of the claimant was not the result of any accidental injury sustained while engaged in hazardous employment by the respondent.

Claim…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Young v. NeelySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  2. Reints v. DiehlSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  3. Rigdon & Bruen Oil Company v. BeermanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  4. Berryhill v. Prudential Premium Co. of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  5. Nebo Oil Company v. WrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bama Pie, Inc. v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  2. City of Oklahoma v. LindseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  3. In Re MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  4. Purdy v. Flint Steel CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  5. Fisher v. Douglas Aircraft CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API