Legal Opinion

Moore v. Village of Gilbert

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 26, 1940No. 32,327PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Stone, Justice.

Defendant appeals from the order denying its alternative motion for amended findings or a new trial after decision for plaintiff.

Defendant .has an ordinance making unlawful the moving of buildings within its corporate limits without a Avritten permit from the village council. There is a flat charge of $50 for each permit. Violation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. In June, 1936, plaintiff, desiring to move a number of houses from Avithin defendant’s limits to places outside, was required to secure permits, for which he paid $550. As a. practical matter, the ordinance,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Joannin v. OgilvieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  3. Town of Balkan v. Village of BuhlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  4. Kelly v. TyraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  5. Mulcahy v. DieudonneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tap House Real Estate, LLC v. City of RochesterDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API