Kim v. Lee
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.
— Yakima Title & Escrow failed to discover Hu Kim’s judgment lien against Sharon and Stanley Lee, *588owners of real estate subject to a deed of trust for which Yakima Title issued a title commitment and policy. Kim obtained a default order and judgment, and began to execute against the Lees’ real property. Yakima Title defended its insured’s lien position by filing a motion to intervene and a motion to quash the execution sale. The trial court granted the motion to intervene but denied the motion to quash. Yakima Title appeals, arguing that (1) Kim’s judgment lien is ineffective for failure to…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- City of Seattle v. Public Employment Relations CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- G.E. Capital Mortgage Services, Inc. v. LevensonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Black v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hu Hyun Kim v. LeeWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Kim v. LeeWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Bank of America, NA v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Kim v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- State v. UlestadCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005