Legal Opinion

Austin W. Lord and J. Monroe Hewlett, Doing Business Under the Firm Name and Style of Lord & Hewlett, Appts. v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 2, 1910No. 162Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

217 U.S. 340

30 S.Ct. 568

54 L.Ed. 790

AUSTIN W. LORD and J. Monroe Hewlett, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Lord & Hewlett, Appts.,

v.

UNITED STATES.

No. 162.

Argued April 20, 1910.

Decided May 2, 1910.

The appellants, doing business as architects under the name of Lord & Hewlett, brought this action to recover from the United States the sum of $75,000 as due them on account of certain transactions relating to a public building which the United States proposed to have constructed and used by the Department of Agriculture.

The court of claims adjudged, upon the facts found, that the…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Harlan.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fay v. CrozerSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Lord & Hewlett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API