Legal Opinion

Ben Cohen & Dickler Inc. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance

Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California

Decided June 19, 1962No. Civ. A. No. 10420Published

1Opinion of the CourtSwain, P. J.

The plaintiff, a fur merchant, insured his stock in trade with the defendant under a “Special Floater Policy” which provided, among other things, “Property in custody of public or common carriers or postal authorities is not covered unless shipped subject to the following conditions: . . . . B. Railway Express Agency, Inc., .... provided that on each shipping package of a value of $500, or more sent by the Assured .... either (1) a value declaration is made to the carrier of not less than 25% of the actual value of the contents of the shipping package, but not necessarily more than $1,000.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hynding v. Home Accident InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Purefoy v. Pacific Automobile Indemnity ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Abrams v. American Fidelity & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Sly v. American Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Votaw v. Farmers Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API