Legal Opinion

Hoyle v. Dimond

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided March 9, 2009No. 1:08-cr-00347PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

INTRODUCTION

JOHN T. CURTIN, District Judge.

In this case, plaintiff seeks damages and restitution from defendants, who operate the not-for-profit Most Holy Family Mon astery (“MHFM”) in Fillmore, New York. According to the complaint, filed May 9, 2008, plaintiff entered the monastery on September 27, 2005 with the intention of becoming a Benedictine monk. He alleges that he later determined that MHFM was not a Benedictine monastery, and left on December 31, 2007. Plaintiff seeks to recover those monies he donated to MHFM in reliance on their representations regarding their affiliation with the…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. Long Island Rail RoadNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Serbian Eastern Orthodox Diocese for United States and Canada v. MilivojevichSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Presbyterian Church in US v. Mary Elizabeth Blue Hull Memorial Presbyterian ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Copantitla v. Fiskardo Estiatorio, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  2. Graham v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  3. Kalimantano GmbH v. Motion in Time, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  4. Sky Medical Supply Inc. v. SCS Support Claims Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2014
  5. Greenlight Reinsurance, Ltd. v. Appalachian Underwriters, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API