City of Ballard v. Ross
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court of King county, Tallman, J., entered December 23, 1903, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action to foreclose the lien of a local improvement assessment.
1Opinion of the Court
Per, Curiam.
On the 6th day of October, 1891, the city of Ballard passed an ordinance providing for the im*210provement of portions of State street in said city. On the 31st day of March, 1903, a second ordinance was passed, reciting the passage of the former ordinance, the completion of the improvement, the levy of an assessment on the property benefited, and the fact that such assessment had been declared invalid by a decision of this court. The ordinance then proceeded to levy a reassessment upon the property benefited, to defray the expenses of the improvement made under the former ordinance.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McMillan v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- City of Ballard v. WayWashington Supreme Court · 1904
- Pennsylvania Co. v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Keene v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- State ex rel. Craver v. McConnaugheyWashington Supreme Court · 1903
3Cited by16 opinions
- Gasaway v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Holzman v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Maryland Realty Co. v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Thomas v. PattersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916
- Robinson v. HansonUtah Supreme Court · 1929
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.