Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Bamber
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided May 18, 1933PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Feely, S.
Before finally settling this estate, the executor began this proceeding to probate anew the last will and codicil of' this testatrix for the purpose of determining the claim made to the executor by Arthur Bird Bamber that he is the adopted son of this testatrix. His claim is based upon an “ agreement,” signed by the husband of testatrix, but not by her, whereby her husband alone, without any recital referring to his wife, agreed with the Children’s Home of Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, “ to receive Arthur Bird into my home, to provide him with board and lodging & clothing and in every…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Sutton v. HaydenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
- Middleworth v. . OrdwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Odenbreit v. UtheimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Bourne v. DorneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
- Baumann v. KusianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Matter of Baby Boy C.New York Court of Appeals · 1994
- In re the Adoption of PadenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1943
- Harvey-Cook v. NeillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- In re the Estate of MazzeoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Smith v. JonesNew York City Family Court · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.