Legal Opinion

Scott v. Beverly Hills Furniture

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 20, 2006PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Grays, J.), dated January 3, 2005, as granted the cross motion of the defendant third-party plaintiff Beverly Hills Furniture for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the cross motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated insofar as asserted against the defendant third-party plaintiff Beverly Hills…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chaplin v. TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Goldman v. Waldbaum, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Naletilic v. Dan's Key FoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Ben-Aharon v. New York City Saks, LLCAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API