Legal Opinion

Ben-Aharon v. New York City Saks, LLC

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided February 28, 2007Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Order, insofar as appealed from, reversed without costs, and motions by the defendant and third-party plaintiff New York City Saks, LLC and by the defendant and third-party defendant M.E. Sabosik Associates for summary judgment granted.

Plaintiff initially instituted this action against New York City Saks, LLC to recover damages sustained when she slipped and fell on an employee staircase in the premises owned and maintained by Saks. Saks thereafter commenced third-party actions for indemnification against the contractor, J. Tucci Construction Co., and its…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Gordon v. American Museum of Natural HistoryNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Goldman v. Waldbaum, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Colt v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. Joachim v. 1824 Church Avenue, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API