Legal Opinion

Sprowl v. Lockett

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 5, 1903No. 14,333PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from judicial district court, parish of Red River; Charles V. Porter, Judge. Petition by L. P. Sprowl and others against N. M. Lockett and others, for revendication of property under a lost will. Exception of no cause of action, maintaining plaintiffs’ appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMonroe, J.

The relevant allegations in the petition in this case are, substantially, as follows:

That petitioners are the only surviving children of Wm. Sprowl, who died insolvent in the parish of Red River; that his brother, Jonathan Sprowl, with his wife, Nancy Barker, in 1862, by authority of a special statute, and by notarial act, adopted Alice L. Hammett; that in January, 1864, Mrs Sprowl died without issue; that in July of that year Jonathan Sprowl married Mrs. Nancy M. Long, and thereafter, in community with her, acquired property in this state; that in January, 1869, Miss Hammett married A. J.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Aubert v. AubertSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1851
  2. Succession of EarhartSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1898
  3. State ex rel. Remendo v. Judge of Second District Court of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1865

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McGregor v. McGregorDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1951
  2. McGregor v. McGregorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
  3. Maddox v. ButcheeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
  4. Succession of DamblySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
  5. In re Sprowl's WillSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API