Legal Opinion

Ex parte Coleman

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 21, 1890PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Ex parte petition for license to practice law.

1Opinion of the CourtBattle, J.

Charles T. Coleman asks that he be “ licensed as an attorney at law and solicitor in chancery,” and says that he is not over twenty-one years of age, “but that his. disabilities have been removed generally by an order of the Pulaski circuit court.”

The statute which prescribes the qualifications of a person entitled to be admitted to practice law in the courts of this-State says he must be a male citizen of the State and of the age of twenty-one years. Coleman is not twenty-one years-old, but says that the disability of minority has been removed from him by an order of the Pulaski circuit…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cox v. TerritoryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. State v. Southwestern Land & Timber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API