Legal Opinion

Sauer v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 15, 1921PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Campbell Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice Hurt

— Reversing.

*759The appellant, who was the plaintiff helow, averred by his petition as amended, that the appellee, who was the defendant below, was a corporation, and among its powers had authority to become a surety on official and other bonds, and in pursuance of such power became and was the surety of its co-defendant, Michael Scheben, in his official bond, as a policeman of the city of Newport. Scheben was a duly qualified and acting policeman of Newport, and among other things it was a duty of his office to drive the motor patrol or ambulance over the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Manwaring v. GeislerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  2. State ex rel. United States School-Furniture Co. v. McGuireWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. BoehnleinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  2. Lewis v. TreadwayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  3. Rice v. LavinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  4. Fidelity Deposit Co. v. Hall, By, Etc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  5. Alexander Thomson, Inc. v. B. Perini & Sons, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API