Legal Opinion

Fusco v. Hill Financial Savings Ass'n

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 30, 1996No. 00023PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order denying appellant’s Petition to Open Judgment. Appellant sets forth ten numbered “questions” for review, all of which allege error in either allowing service by publication, failure to strike the default judgment or failure to open judgment. Because we believe the court erred in failing to open judgment we reverse.

This is a somewhat complex case involving an array of parties to a mortgage. Appellees are the original conveyors of a mortgage interest in property purchased by them in Ding-mans Ferry, Pennsylvania. The original mortgagee was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Duckson v. Wee Wheelers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Deer Park Lumber, Inc. v. MajorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. US Bank N.A. v. MallorySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Citimortgage, Inc. v. Barbezat, E.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. Pilchesky v. GatelliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Sisson, D. & M. v. Stanley, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Himmelreich v. Hostetter Farm Supply, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API