Legal Opinion

Dowling v. Comerford

California Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1893No. 14957PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Temple, C.

This action was brought to foreclose a street assessment, and the appeal is taken by Moses and Ann Comer-ford, against whom judgment was entered upon default, from the judgment upon the judgment roll.

April 10, 1890, an amended complaint was filed and an amended summons issued. The amended summons required defendants to appear and answer “the complaint filed therein, or judgment by default will be entered against you according to the prayer of the complaint,” and they were notified “that if you fail to appear and answer the said complaint as above required, the said plaintiff will…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sichler v. LookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Meyer v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Baldwin v. FosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Gillette v. Burbank Community HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Koeper v. KoeperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Meyer v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API