Legal Opinion

In re Holt

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 2012No. 2011-BR-00600-SCTPublished

1Opinion of the Court

KITCHENS, Justice,

for the Court:

¶ 1. Christopher G. Holt was disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Mississippi by a complaint tribunal in April 2003.1 The tribunal found that the Bar had proven the factual allegations of its formal complaint, and further found that Holt had violated certain Rules of Professional Conduct. Holt now seeks reinstatement to the practice of law pursuant to Rule 12 of the Mississippi Rules of Discipline, but the Bar opposes Holt’s petition for reinstatement. Finding that Holt is eligible for reinstatement to the practice of law, we grant the petition…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ex Parte MarshallMississippi Supreme Court · 1933
  2. In Re BensonMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Phillips v. Mississippi State BarMississippi Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Mississippi State Bar Ass'n v. WadeMississippi Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Shah v. the Mississippi BarMississippi Supreme Court · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API