Legal Opinion
Mitts v. Bagley
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 1, 2010No. 05-4420PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The court having received a petition for rehearing en banc, and the petition having been circulated not only to the original panel members but also to all other active * judges of this court, and less than a majority of the judges having favored the suggestion, the petition for rehearing has been referred to the original panel.
The panel has further reviewed the petition for rehearing and concludes that the issues raised in the petition were fully considered upon the original submission and decision of the case. Accordingly, the petition is denied.
2ConcurrenceSutton, Circuit Judge, joined by Kethledge, Circuit Judge,
This en banc petition illustrates a…
3Cases cited12 opinions
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Beck v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Mills v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- State v. BrooksOhio Supreme Court · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by10 opinions
- Bristol Reg'l Women's Center v. Herbert Slatery, IIICourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- Reiyn Keohane v. Florida Department of Corrections SecretaryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
- Memphis Center for Reproductive Health v. Herbert Slatery, IIICourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
- Fox v. Saginaw, County ofDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022
- In Re: Ohio Execution Protocol LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.