Legal Opinion
Mirlis v. Greer
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided April 17, 2017No. CASE NO. 3:16cv678(MPS)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*613RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL
Donna F. Martinez, United States Magistrate Judge
Pending before the court is the defendants’ motion to compel nonparty Aviad Hack to answer certain questions asked at his deposition. (Doc. # 29.)
I. Procedural Background
The plaintiff, Eliyahu Mirlis, brought this diversity action against defendants Yeshiva of New Haven, Inc., an orthodox Jewish school, and Rabbi Greer, the school’s principal. The plaintiff alleges that defendant Greer sexually molested him from 2002 to 2005 when the plaintiff was a student at the school. (Doc. # 117, Am. Compl. ¶ 12.)
During…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- American Hangar, Inc. v. Basic Line, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1985
- American Tobacco Company v. American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- State v. MARK R.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bennett v. Metro-North Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
- Main Street America Assurance Company v. SavalleDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2019
- Rech v. Monroe CountyDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2019
- Sacerdote v. Cammack LaRhette Advisors, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025