Legal Opinion · Dissent

Carroll v. Whitney

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 2000No. W1997-00246-SC-R11-CVPublished

1DissentE. Riley Anderson, C.J.

The majority departs from settled principles of law in holding that a jury may allocate fault to an immune nonparty. In SO doing, it refuses to apply and overrules the application in this case of the Tennessee Supreme Court’s unanimous decision just four years ago in Ridings v. Ralph M. Parsons Co., 914 S.W.2d 79 (Tenn.1996), that a jury may not allocate fault to an immune nonparty because the immune nonparty owes no duty to the plaintiff and therefore the plaintiff has no cause of action against the immune nonparty.

In my view, the Court of Appeals correctly applied Ridings in concluding that…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. State v. MiddlebrooksTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Coln v. City of SavannahTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  5. United States v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API