Legal Opinion
Samide v. Roman Catholic Diocese
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 8, 2004PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for discrimination based on sex, negligent supervision, and breach of contract, the defendants Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn, Thomas Y. Daily, James Spengler, Otto Garcia, Anthony Danile, and St. Elizabeth’s Roman Catholic Church, appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hart, J.), dated June 30, 2003, as (1), in effect, granted that branch of the plaintiffs motion pursuant to CPLR 3126 which was to strike their answer unless the defendants Thomas Y. Daily, James Spengler, Otto Garcia,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Allen v. Crowell-Collier Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Abbene v. GriffinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Corporate Interiors, Inc. v. PappasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kamchi v. WeissmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Kerman v. FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Waltzer v. Tradescape & Co., LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Dynamic Medical Imaging, P.C. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew York District Court · 2010
- MBIA Insurace v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.