Legal Opinion

Osborne v. . Anderson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 5, 1883PublishedCited by 8 opinions

EjjgctMENT tried at Spring Term, 1883, of AlleghaNY Superior Court, before Graves, J. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff; appeal by defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

In the year 1828, Joshua Cox, by deed, conveyed to Moses Dixon, an estate limited for want of words of inheritance to the term of his life in the tract of land described in the complaint, of which that in controversy is claimed by the plaintiff to constitute part. Moses Dixon entered and continued in possession of the land until his death, in 1863, as did his son (Back) thereafter until December, 1868, when he sold and conveyed to plaintiff.

In 1856, a grant issued from the state to J. M. Gentry, under whom the defendant Anderson claims, by virtue of'á written contract for a tract which…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Davis v. . McArthurSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Staton v. . MullisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  2. Bland v. . BeasleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  3. Brittain v. . DanielsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  4. Fisher v. Cid Copper Mining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  5. Allen v. . SallingerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API