Legal Opinion

Haddad v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 30, 2015No. 15-640Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

CIRIG!$$AI" Iln tbeffinitet btuteg {.ourt of fBDeruL @Iuimg Nos. 15-640C & 15-820C (Filed November 30, 2015) NOT FOR PUBLICATION ************************ FILED NoY 3 0 20ts RON HADDAD, Jr., U.S, COURT OF FEDEMLCLAIMS Plaintiff, THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. ************************ MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER WOLSKI, Judge. The matters before the court are the defendant's motions to dismiss these consolidated cases pursuant to Rule 12&)(1) and 12G)(6) ofthe Rules ofthe united States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC). For the reasons discussed below, defendant's motions are GRANTED due to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Donald A. Henke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  4. Uttecht v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Gabriel J. Martinez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API