Legal Opinion
Shook v. Shook
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided April 1, 1899PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Error from Dallas. Tried below before Hon W. J. J. Smith.
1Opinion of the Court
RAINEY, Associate Justice.
The only question for determination is whether or not the real estate in controversy is a part of the homestead of W. F. Shook and wife. If so, the judgment must be affirmed.
The evidence shows that about ten years ago W. F. Shook, who was then the head of a famity, and has been ever since, purchased for his homestead a lot situated on the corner of Bryan and Crockett streets in the city of Dallas. Said lot fronted 90 feet on Bryan Street and run back 180 feet on Crockett Street. About ten feet of the lot is taken up by the sidewalk. At that time there were several…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Blum v. RogersTexas Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by7 opinions
- H. P. Drought & Co. v. StallworthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
- O'Fiel v. JanesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Hibbs v. City Nat. Bank of Wichita FallsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Norwood v. ChildressCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
- Walker-Smith Co. v. WhaleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.