Legal Opinion

State v. Coyne

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 12, 2010No. AC 29390PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BISHOP, J.

The defendant, Mark Andrew Coyne, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered following a jury trial, of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drugs in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 2005) § 14-227a (a) (1). See footnote 5 of this opinion. On appeal, the defendant asserts a number of evidentiary claims and also claims that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction. Specifically, the defendant claims that the court improperly (1) denied his motion to preclude evidence of the horizontal gaze nystagmus test 1…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. SawyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  3. Sullivan v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  4. State v. BeaversSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  5. State v. GonzalezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pietrangelo v. Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr, LLPDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. State v. ArtisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  3. State v. MarsanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
  4. State v. IngramConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  5. State v. MosbackConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API