Legal Opinion
Muniz v. Ransomes America Corp.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided June 6, 1995No. Civil A. C-94-7PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT AND DISMISSING DEFENDANT VICTOR M. GARCIA
JACK, District Judge.
On this day came to be heard Defendant Tecom, Incorporated’s Motion for Summary Judgement against Plaintiffs Marcus Muniz and Sylvia Muniz.
I. Jurisdiction.
Because the controversy in question arose under the Constitution and laws of the United States, this Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 1331. For the reasons addressed below, the Court GRANTS the Motion for Summary Judgment urged by the Defendant Tecom, Incorporated (hereinafter referred…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- El Chico Corp. v. PooleTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- State Farm Life Insurance Company v. Diane D. Gutterman v. Regan Daughtry Gutterman and John S. Gutterman, Iii, Infants, and H.J. Davidson, Jr., Co-Guardian Ad Litem of the Minor Children, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Abalos v. Oil Development Co. of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rodriguez v. Riddell Sports, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001