Legal Opinion
People v. Miller
New York City Magistrates' Court
Decided October 26, 1961PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Morris Weinfeld, M.
On March 28, 1961, the complainant, Ervin Palmer, delivered his dog to an establishment operated under the corporate name of Poodles by Dana, Inc., at 78th Street and Second Avenue, in the City, County and State of New York, for washing and cleaning.
It appears that there was negligence by an employee of this corporation in grooming complainant’s dog, but there is no evidence that defendant personally ministered to the animal or personally contributed to the injuries apparently suffered when drying apparatus was unduly left unattended, causing burns and regrettable injuries.
A…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Armour Packing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- People Ex Rel. Price v. Sheffield Farms-Slawson-Decker Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Armour Packing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Telegram Newspaper Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. Lenti, New York County Courts1964
- People v. AtkinsCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1974