Legal Opinion

Ulrich v. Ulrich

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1961No. 3006PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harnsberger

On November 19, 1955, the parties herein, being then husband and wife, executed an agreement as a full and final adjustment of all their property rights, interests and claims, including the distribution of all property. . Among its provisions are the following which have important bearing upon the issues involved here:

“1. That, except as hereinafter specified, each party hereto is hereby released and absolved from any and all obligations and liabilities for the future acts and duties of the other, and that each of said parties hereby releases the other from any and all liabilities, debts, or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Porter v. Montaldo'sDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1946
  2. Nakken Patents Corp. v. RabinowitzDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1940
  3. Porter v. Central Chevrolet, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1946
  4. Caggiano v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1939

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Broyles v. BroylesWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Pauling v. PaulingWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Prentice v. PrenticeWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Cubin v. CubinWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Booker v. BookerWyoming Supreme Court · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API